As I mentioned the other day, I have been working my way through the mid-1950s Superboy issues looking for more swipes by Weisinger and company. I came across two more, although these were not quite as blatant. First:
Despite the rather obvious swipe of the cover concept, the stories themselves have only a superficial similarity. In the Superboy story, Clark was unaware that his teacher had instructed the class to wear Superboy costumes for Superboy day in Smallville, because he had been absent from the classroom when the order was made. In the Supergirl story, a TV producer had given everybody at Stanhope copies of her uniform (including Linda), but hers was damaged when she used it on a mission in her other identity. The latter story turns out to be an effort by the TV guy to expose Supergirl's secret identity. In the former, Clark sweats it out that the reason he was chosen to be dressed in plainclothes was that someone had guessed his secret, but it turns out instead that hidden inside his jacket was a letter signed by everybody in town thanking Superboy.
It's comparable to these two stories with identical titles:
Same concept, different execution. In the first story (from Superboy #50) a gang of crooks have come to Smallville to hide out with their loot, although one of the underlings is worried about the rumors that a young lad has super powers has recently been making things tough for the local criminals. The boss, as shown, finds the concept of a Superboy to be ridiculous, although he soon learns otherwise. In the later story, Superboy goes to a nearby old West town where the local hoods haven't heard of him.
Wednesday, June 18, 2014
Wednesday, June 11, 2014
The Secret Origin of Pete Ross
I've been working my way through the mid-1950s issues of Superboy, looking for more stories that were later swiped by Weisinger, and the first one I found is rather significant.
Did you know that Pete Ross' original name was Billy Todd? He popped up in Superboy #47 (March 1956). When we meet him, Billy is helping Clark deal with some bullying:
Just as Pete did in Superboy #86 (January 1961):
He offers to be Clark's pal, but the Boy of Steel is too worried about protecting his secret identity. Fortunately, Ma and Pa Kent intervene, inviting the new chum to dinner. After the meal, Clark shows off his hobby:
As he would later to Pete.
Billy later shows off his own hobby, which is creating miniature replicas of famous structures, such as the Eiffel Tower, the Empire State Building, and the Golden Gate Bridge. Pete has different pastimes: acting and detective work.
Now that they are friends, Clark finds himself (as Superboy) often saving Billy from perilous situations:
As he also did with Pete:
Which leads inevitably to some awkward moments:
Clark is disturbed to learn that his new pal is checking Superboy's measurements:
Which leads him inevitably to the conclusion that his supposed buddy is plotting to betray him. But fortunately there is an innocent explanation:
Pete Ross went on to become a recurring character in the DC Silver Age, albeit a minor one. As I have discussed earlier, he became the only person other than Ma and Pa Kent to know Superboy's secret identity. Billy Todd? As best as I can tell, this was his only appearance.
Update: Kirk House pointed out in the comments that in Action #457, Pete Ross's son apparently lost his will to live. Only one thing could save him; if Superman divulged his secret identity to the young lad. The story is pretty good; ironically the many times that people have suspected Clark Kent as Supes works against the disclosure, as Jon Ross cites those incidents for his skepticism. Fortunately he has figured out another way to prove it that Clark had not protected himself against:
There are a couple of interesting ironies about this story. First, Pete could have told his son that Clark was Superman, or at least confirmed it, except that Supes himself was unaware that his boyhood chum knew the truth. Second is that the many times Clark had been suspected of being the Man of Steel and managed to deceive people into reconsidering actually worked against him. This echoes a Golden Age Batman story where Bruce Wayne lost his position as the guardian of Dick Grayson, in large part because he had convinced the public that he was a dissolute playboy.
The concept of someone making a deathbed request to learn a superhero's secret ID had been used several times already, including at least two Batman tales and one in Jimmy Olsen:
Did you know that Pete Ross' original name was Billy Todd? He popped up in Superboy #47 (March 1956). When we meet him, Billy is helping Clark deal with some bullying:
Just as Pete did in Superboy #86 (January 1961):
He offers to be Clark's pal, but the Boy of Steel is too worried about protecting his secret identity. Fortunately, Ma and Pa Kent intervene, inviting the new chum to dinner. After the meal, Clark shows off his hobby:
As he would later to Pete.
Billy later shows off his own hobby, which is creating miniature replicas of famous structures, such as the Eiffel Tower, the Empire State Building, and the Golden Gate Bridge. Pete has different pastimes: acting and detective work.
Now that they are friends, Clark finds himself (as Superboy) often saving Billy from perilous situations:
As he also did with Pete:
Which leads inevitably to some awkward moments:
Clark is disturbed to learn that his new pal is checking Superboy's measurements:
Which leads him inevitably to the conclusion that his supposed buddy is plotting to betray him. But fortunately there is an innocent explanation:
Pete Ross went on to become a recurring character in the DC Silver Age, albeit a minor one. As I have discussed earlier, he became the only person other than Ma and Pa Kent to know Superboy's secret identity. Billy Todd? As best as I can tell, this was his only appearance.
Update: Kirk House pointed out in the comments that in Action #457, Pete Ross's son apparently lost his will to live. Only one thing could save him; if Superman divulged his secret identity to the young lad. The story is pretty good; ironically the many times that people have suspected Clark Kent as Supes works against the disclosure, as Jon Ross cites those incidents for his skepticism. Fortunately he has figured out another way to prove it that Clark had not protected himself against:
There are a couple of interesting ironies about this story. First, Pete could have told his son that Clark was Superman, or at least confirmed it, except that Supes himself was unaware that his boyhood chum knew the truth. Second is that the many times Clark had been suspected of being the Man of Steel and managed to deceive people into reconsidering actually worked against him. This echoes a Golden Age Batman story where Bruce Wayne lost his position as the guardian of Dick Grayson, in large part because he had convinced the public that he was a dissolute playboy.
The concept of someone making a deathbed request to learn a superhero's secret ID had been used several times already, including at least two Batman tales and one in Jimmy Olsen:
Saturday, June 07, 2014
You Can Learn a Lot from Comic Books
Some of which just ain't so. Consider these two amazing "facts" which I discovered while reading a couple of Superboy issues from 1954-1955:
I can imagine a kid believing those things, but an adult should be just a little more skeptical. Women in general live longer than men (about 7 years longer the last I heard), so it would be quite surprising to learn that a man actually held the title for the oldest documented living human. We would also, given advances in medicine and corresponding advances in average life expectancy, for the oldest person ever to me more recent. And in fact, according to Wikipedia, the current record for the oldest person is a Frenchwoman named Jeanne Calment, who passed away just 17 years ago at age 122. In fact, of the ten longest-living people, only one (the tenth) was a man.
As for Drakenberg, simple math reveals that even with the dates given he did not "complete 146 years," but 145. And this website reveals why that age is suspect at best:
As for the male deer bot fly Wikipedia notes:
In 1938 Irving Langmuir, recipient of the 1932 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, examined the claim in detail and refuted the estimate. Among his specific criticisms were:
Here's another bit from a text piece on how the toys of the 1950s were preparing kids for the jobs of tomorrow:
Now that may seem a bit sexist, but this was the 1950s when Dad went off to work and Mom took care of the kids. In fact, my mother (before she got married) had her first job as a switchboard operator. But I certainly hope no young girls practiced too hard on this toy, as the switchboard was already on its way out.
I can imagine a kid believing those things, but an adult should be just a little more skeptical. Women in general live longer than men (about 7 years longer the last I heard), so it would be quite surprising to learn that a man actually held the title for the oldest documented living human. We would also, given advances in medicine and corresponding advances in average life expectancy, for the oldest person ever to me more recent. And in fact, according to Wikipedia, the current record for the oldest person is a Frenchwoman named Jeanne Calment, who passed away just 17 years ago at age 122. In fact, of the ten longest-living people, only one (the tenth) was a man.
As for Drakenberg, simple math reveals that even with the dates given he did not "complete 146 years," but 145. And this website reveals why that age is suspect at best:
The certificate also states the names of Drakenberg's parents, and of the farm at which he was born. In the postscript of the latest edition of Drakenberg's biography from 1972 Paul G. Ørberg disproves all the facts listed in this certificate (Ørberg 1972). The vicar of Skee in 1732 was Johan Schoug and the vicar in 1626 was Christoffer Lauritzen Friis; the two vicars named in the document have apparently never existed. The farm on which Drakenberg had allegedly been born had just been built in 1626, and was owned by someone else; no trace can be found of the people named as Drakenberg's parents and finally no church register going back to 1626 exists from the church of Skee, and it is doubtful whether one ever has. In other words the certificate proving the amazing age of Drakenberg is a forgery, though a very successful one.
As for the male deer bot fly Wikipedia notes:
In 1938 Irving Langmuir, recipient of the 1932 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, examined the claim in detail and refuted the estimate. Among his specific criticisms were:
- To maintain a velocity of 800 miles per hour, the 0.3-gram fly would have had to consume more than 150% of its body weight in food every second;
- The fly would have produced an audible sonic boom;
- The supersonic fly would have been invisible to the naked eye; and
- The impact trauma of such a fly colliding with a human body would resemble that of a gunshot wound
Here's another bit from a text piece on how the toys of the 1950s were preparing kids for the jobs of tomorrow:
Now that may seem a bit sexist, but this was the 1950s when Dad went off to work and Mom took care of the kids. In fact, my mother (before she got married) had her first job as a switchboard operator. But I certainly hope no young girls practiced too hard on this toy, as the switchboard was already on its way out.
Sunday, June 01, 2014
What Do These Two Covers Have In Common?
Superboy #60:
Supernan #198:
It's pretty obviously the gadget that somehow sees through clothing to reveal the S insignia on Superboy's/Superman's costume. These gadgets are referred to in the stories as X-rays, although of course they do not work the way X-rays really do. A real X-ray actually goes entirely through the person until it hits the film which then reveals the internal organs and bones. There is no reason for the device to stop at one layer of clothing. Although Superman's costume is invulnerable, it is not impervious to X-rays, at least according to this cover:
The two hand-held X-ray gadgets actually work pretty much like young boys hoped the X-ray specs advertised in the comics would.
The Superboy #60 story is the more interesting of the X-ray gadget stories. When Superboy learns that a quiz show is intentionally stacking the deck against a young Smallville inventor, he helps the boy create some devices, including, ironically, the X-ray device that reveals his secret identity. This appears to predate the public revelations about the quiz show scandals of the late 1950s. I talked four years ago about an even earlier Batman story that exposed shenanigans in the genre.
In the Superboy story, the young inventor is eventually able to keep $30,000 (the amount he had accumulated before the Boy of Steel's intervention). That would be a small fortune in those days, enough to purchase a house, car and a college education.
The Superman story is less interesting; it turns out that the bearded Clark Kent is actually from another dimension, where Superman was evil and had disposed of Clark. But then we learn that it's all a trick to trap Superman in the other dimension.
By the way, in both stories, Clark is able to convince people that the actual device being used on him was actually just a projector which put the S emblem on his chest.
Supernan #198:
It's pretty obviously the gadget that somehow sees through clothing to reveal the S insignia on Superboy's/Superman's costume. These gadgets are referred to in the stories as X-rays, although of course they do not work the way X-rays really do. A real X-ray actually goes entirely through the person until it hits the film which then reveals the internal organs and bones. There is no reason for the device to stop at one layer of clothing. Although Superman's costume is invulnerable, it is not impervious to X-rays, at least according to this cover:
The two hand-held X-ray gadgets actually work pretty much like young boys hoped the X-ray specs advertised in the comics would.
The Superboy #60 story is the more interesting of the X-ray gadget stories. When Superboy learns that a quiz show is intentionally stacking the deck against a young Smallville inventor, he helps the boy create some devices, including, ironically, the X-ray device that reveals his secret identity. This appears to predate the public revelations about the quiz show scandals of the late 1950s. I talked four years ago about an even earlier Batman story that exposed shenanigans in the genre.
In the Superboy story, the young inventor is eventually able to keep $30,000 (the amount he had accumulated before the Boy of Steel's intervention). That would be a small fortune in those days, enough to purchase a house, car and a college education.
The Superman story is less interesting; it turns out that the bearded Clark Kent is actually from another dimension, where Superman was evil and had disposed of Clark. But then we learn that it's all a trick to trap Superman in the other dimension.
By the way, in both stories, Clark is able to convince people that the actual device being used on him was actually just a projector which put the S emblem on his chest.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)